Click Here
For a printable version of this page

Doctor's Name

License Number

License Status


 Naresh Durgaprasad Sharma 68991 Current - (Dues Paid)
Accusation Filed
City of Record  Region License Issued
Brooklyn, NY Out of State 06/24/1999
Licensing Boards Specialties Gender
Medical Anesthesiologist
Male
Accusations and Infractions or Causes for Discipline Date of Last MBC Action
Repeated Negligent Acts
Gross Negligence
02/03/2016
Repeat Offender? Pending MBC Activity? Out of State Dicipline
No Yes No
CMA Member? No Medical Board Activity?  
No
If a button appears below, you can click it to go to that website for more information.
                     


Medical Board Documents, News Articles, Court Documents, Etc.
+Accusation 2/03/2016
 

Additional Information (Medical School, Dated Actions, Excerpts from Disciplinary Actions, Notes)

GUJARAT UNIVERSITY, N. H. L. MUNICIPAL MEDICAL COLLEGE
#ETHN

  • 2/03/2016—ACCUSATION FILED.


Excerpt from Accusation dated 2/03/2016:

FIRST CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Gross Negligence)

6. Respondent Naresh D. Sharma, M.D. is subject to disciplinary action under section 2234, subdivision (b), in that he was grossly negligent in his care and treatment of patient K.K. The circumstances are as follows:

A. Patient K.K. suffered a back injury at work in 2008. That year K.K. had a microdiscectomy, which is a spine surgery intended to take pressure off the nerves and relieve back pain. However, five months after the surgery he had issues with the disc again. He became depressed because of the difficulties he was having with his injury.

B. Dr. L., a psychiatrist, started treating patient K.K. for depression, anxiety, and sleeplessness. K.K. was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder With Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. He was prescribed Wellbutrin, MS Cantin, Norco, Xanax, and Ambien.

C. In July 2013, Respondent did a Utilization Review, which is used in Workers' Compensation cases to determine whether treatment is medically necessary. Respondent attempted to call K.K.'s psychiatrist, Dr. L. a few times, but it was over the July 4 holiday weekend. Respondent never spoke to Dr. L. prior to making his final decision.

D. Respondent denied coverage for Klonopin, Xanax, and Ambien, and cut in half the dosage for the Wellbutrin. After K.K. abruptly stopped taking the medications, he had his first seizure on August 7, 2013. The next week on August 14, he had his second seizure and was taken to the Kaiser ER. The next day, on August 15, he had his third seizure, and on August 16, 2013, he had his fourth seizure and was taken by ambulance to the ER. The doctors concluded that the seizures were caused by the abrupt cessation ofthe benzodiazepines.

E. On August 26, 2013, K.K. saw a Dr. P. who placed him on Keppra, which is a seizure medication. Since that time he has had no more seizures. The total time K.K. was off the medications was for two weeks in August 2013.

Allegations of Gross Negligence:

F. Respondent only looked at a few of K.K.'s medical records in reaching his decision. If he had done a comprehensive evaluation, he would have had a better understanding of K.K.'s complex psychiatric history. Respondent's performance ofthe Utilization Review was an extreme departure from the standard of care.

G. Respondent, an anesthesiologist, had no specific mental health training. Thus, it was an extreme departure from this standard of care for him to review the mental health treatment of K.K.

H. Discontinuing benzodiazepines without tapering was an extreme departure from the standard of care. The standard of care is to taper off these medications, and it is a well known side effect that abrupt discontinuation can cause seizures.

I. There is nothing in the medical records that establishes any basis for Respondent decreasing the Wellbutrin. Respondent's modification of Wellbutrin was an extreme departure from the standard of care.

SECOND CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Repeated Negligent Acts)

7. Respondent Naresh D. Sharma, M.D. is subject to disciplinary action under section 2234, subdivision (c), in that he provided negligent treatment to  patient K.K. The circumstances are as follows:

8. Complainant incorporates by reference the allegations contained above in paragraph 6, A-I, as though fully stated herein.



#OVERDUE

Make a note of the doctor's license number, then click here to go to the Medical Board of California lookup page.
This Record was entered on: 01/08/2018This Record was modified on: 07/01/2018

This website came about when it was discovered that the Medical Board of California's website was very flawed and missing a startling amount of Public disciplinary information. When we tried to work with the board (at the time, Executive Director Kimberly Kirchmeyer and Staff Attorney Kerrie Webb), they chose to not participate and made it very difficult to get the public information we were requesting, which they still do to this day. It was due to their inaction and beligerance that this website was created. Anyone having a problem with this website's existence or the information it contains, should direct their criticism to the Medical Board of California by clicking their names to send an email to them.

DISCLAIMER: Most of the information found on this website is hand-culled directly from the Medical Board of California's ("Board") website and from news articles and is only as good as that original information; it's just easier to find and read here. We have a VERY small team of advocates working on this project, and cannot keep everything up to date in real time. Always check the Medical Board website directly for more information or changes.

Infractions are pulled from the "Board's" disciplinary documents themselves and/or news articles. Sometimes the categories here don't match the Medical Board's categories exactly, so make sure you look up the infractions in the actual Medical Board documents.

Note: "Accusations" mean that a doctor has not had a hearing or been found guilty of any charges, but are being investigated by the Medical Board and/or the California Attorney General's Office.

**The California Medical Association (CMA) is a union of sorts for doctors in California. They have a lot of political power and donate a lot of money to the state's legislators in return for their "support." They appear to have a lot of "sway" over the Medical Board's members. One would think that most doctors would be members of the CMA with the amount of power they wield, but in actuality, 2/3 of this state's doctors refuse to join the CMA...which means that the majority of doctors in the state, choose to NOT be members.

This website is for informational and educational purposes only and is here only to help consumers research their doctors and make their own decisions, and does not necessarily reflect the feelings or research of the owners or moderators of this website or of The Patient Safety League. Please contact the webmaster with any questions, or to report errors or ommissions at webmaster@4patientsafety.org