Click Here
For a printable version of this page

Doctor's Name

License Number

License Status


 Michael Jen-Kung Huang 84045 Current - (Dues Paid)
Accusation Filed
City of Record  Region License Issued
Roseville Sacramento 07/23/2003
Licensing Boards Specialties Gender
Medical General/Family Practice
Male
Accusations and Infractions or Causes for Discipline Date of Last MBC Action
Failure To Maintain Adequate Records
Unprofessional Conduct
Repeated Negligent Acts
10/07/2019
Repeat Offender? Pending MBC Activity? Out of State Dicipline
No Yes No
CMA Member? No Medical Board Activity?  
No
If a button appears below, you can click it to go to that website for more information.
                     


Medical Board Documents, News Articles, Court Documents, Etc.
Accusation 10/07/2019
 

Additional Information (Medical School, Dated Actions, Excerpts from Disciplinary Actions, Notes)

ST. GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE—GRENADA

10/07/2019—ACCUSATION FILED.

Excerpt from Accusation dated 10/07/2019:

FIRST CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Repeated Negligent Acts)

 

8. Respondent Michael Jen-Kung Huang, M.D. has subjected his Physician's and Surgeon's Certificate No. A 84045 to disciplinary action under sections 2227 and 2234, as defined by 2234, subdivision (c), of the Code, in that Respondent committed repeated negligent acts in his care and treatment of Patient A as more particularly alleged hereinafter.

9. On or about June 5, 2015, Patient A went to Respondent's practice for a wellness visit. Patient A's medical history included seizures with no incidents of reoccurrence, poor circulation involving the hands and feet, chronic persistent yeast infections, persistent anxiety, depression, insomnia, and chronic headaches.

10. With respect to the seizures, Respondent advised Patient A to continue to monitor her situation and contact the clinic as needed.

11. Respondent determined Patient A's poor circulation was possibly due to Raynaud'~ syndrome. Respondent advised Patient A to contact the clinic for follow-up if symptoms recurred.

12. Respondent referred Patient A to a gynecologist for evaluation regarding the yeast infections.

13. Respondent conducted a physical exam and spoke with Patient A about the underlying causes for the anxiety and depression. Ultimately, Respondent determined the anxiety and depression were associated with family and social stres~ors as well as excessive caffeine. Respondent advised Patient A to increase exercise and healthy hobbies, and decrease caffeine intake. Furthermore, Respondent also prescribed Patient A with Prozac. Respondent prescribed a starting dosage of 20 mg. He prescribed 30 (thirty) capsules at the outset, but permitted a total of 4 (four) refills. Specifically, Respondent permitted Patient A to increase the dosage to 40 mg after4 weeks, and 60 mg after 8 weeks, if needed. In total, Patient A received enough medication for 2 months and 20 days if taken as prescribed. Patient A was to follow-up at the clinic if there were no improvements or if there were any adverse effects from the medication. There were no future appointments scheduled.

14. For the headaches, Respondent thought they were secondary to stress-induced tension and advised Patient A to stretch, heat, and massage the area accordingly.

15. Sometime between July 8, 2015 and September 11, 2015, Respondent learned Patient A had committed suicide on or about July 8, 2015. Patient A had alcohol and hydrocodone in her system.

16. On or about September 11, 2015, Respondent reviewed the medical records for Patient A. On that same date, Respondent modified Patient A's medical records to add "Patient wish medication treatment and will start [Prozac]." This note was added in three separate sections of the medical records. Respondent did not notate the date or time of the addendums.

17. On or about December 10, 2018, Respondent was interviewed at the Health Quality Investigation Unit's Sacramento Office regarding the care and treatment provided to Patient A. During the subject interview, Respondent stated he "believe[d]" he asked about Patient A's substance abuse history. Respondent stated his medical assistant would typically ask about a patient's smoking, alcohol, and drug history. Respondent recalled Patient A was not using substances.

18. Respondent committed acts of repeated negligence in his care and treatment of Patient A, which included, but are not limited to, the following:

(a) Respondent failed to schedule a follow-up appointment for Patient A after initiating anti-depressant treatment;

(b) Respondent failed to properly assess Patient A's substance abuse; and

(c) Respondent failed to document the date and time of his addendum to Patient A's medical records.

SECOND CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Failure to Maintain Adequate and Accurate Medical Records)

19. Respondent Michael Jen-Kung Huang, M.D., has further subjected his Physician's and Surgeon's Certificate No. A 84045 to disciplinary action under sections 2227 and 2234, as defined in section 2266, of the Code, in that Respondent failed to maintain adequate and accurate records in connection with his care and treatment of Patient A, as more particularly alleged in Paragraphs 8 through 18, above, which are hereby incorporated by reference and realleged as if fully set forth herein.

THIRD CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Unprofessional Conduct)

20. Respondent Michael Jen-Kung Huang, M.D., has further subjected his Physician's and Surgeon's Certificate No. A 84045 to disciplinary action under sections 2227 and 2234 of the Code, in that Respondent has engaged in conduct which breached the rules or ethical code of the medical profession, or conduct which demonstrates an unfitness to practice medicine, as more particularly alleged in paragraphs 8 through 19 above, which are hereby incorporated by reference and realleged as if fully set forth herein.

Make a note of the doctor's license number, then click here to go to the Medical Board of California lookup page.
This Record was entered on: 12/04/2019This Record was modified on: 12/04/2019

This website came about when it was discovered that the Medical Board of California's website was very flawed and missing a startling amount of Public disciplinary information. When we tried to work with the board (at the time, Executive Director Kimberly Kirchmeyer and Staff Attorney Kerrie Webb), they chose to not participate and made it very difficult to get the public information we were requesting, which they still do to this day. It was due to their inaction and beligerance that this website was created. Anyone having a problem with this website's existence or the information it contains, should direct their criticism to the Medical Board of California by clicking their names to send an email to them.

DISCLAIMER: Most of the information found on this website is hand-culled directly from the Medical Board of California's ("Board") website and from news articles and is only as good as that original information; it's just easier to find and read here. We have a VERY small team of advocates working on this project, and cannot keep everything up to date in real time. Always check the Medical Board website directly for more information or changes.

Infractions are pulled from the "Board's" disciplinary documents themselves and/or news articles. Sometimes the categories here don't match the Medical Board's categories exactly, so make sure you look up the infractions in the actual Medical Board documents.

Note: "Accusations" mean that a doctor has not had a hearing or been found guilty of any charges, but are being investigated by the Medical Board and/or the California Attorney General's Office.

**The California Medical Association (CMA) is a union of sorts for doctors in California. They have a lot of political power and donate a lot of money to the state's legislators in return for their "support." They appear to have a lot of "sway" over the Medical Board's members. One would think that most doctors would be members of the CMA with the amount of power they wield, but in actuality, 2/3 of this state's doctors refuse to join the CMA...which means that the majority of doctors in the state, choose to NOT be members.

This website is for informational and educational purposes only and is here only to help consumers research their doctors and make their own decisions, and does not necessarily reflect the feelings or research of the owners or moderators of this website or of The Patient Safety League. Please contact the webmaster with any questions, or to report errors or ommissions at webmaster@4patientsafety.org